Friday, May 9, 2008

Two Chinas


Two Chinas
"In China City, Protestors See Pollution Risk of New Plant" by Edward Wong

The more I read, the larger the gap between urban and rural segments of Chinese society seems. Earlier, I had written about some of the environmental concerns involving the Yellow River. Aside from the pollution, there is the upsetting image of the complete loss of power on the part of those affected. There seems to be no organized large-scale protests and/or demonstrations.

Contrast that sense of almost inevitability to a recent New York Times article concerning a relatively large anti-pollution protest in Beijing. The protest is, for me, a positive sign. We have seen so many instances when the Chinese did not protest, that I was glad to see hundreds of people meeting to demonstrate against the building of a new state run petrochemical plant ($5.5 billion dollars worth of plant!). The protest was interesting for a number of reasons. First, its organization depended upon modern technology. The group was “organized through Web sites, blogs and cell phone text messages, illustrating how some Chinese are using digital technology to start civic movements, which are usually banned by the police. Organizers also used text messages to publicize their cause nationally.” Clearly this is technology not readily available to most farmers fighting to keep their land clear and to ward off the pollution and slow death of the Yellow River. Second, those involved were protesting against building the plant so close to a large urban center. Perhaps moving the plant out to the country where it can only affect the environment and the farmers is a better idea? Seems like a doubly whammy for the rural population and yet one more example of the every-widening disconnect between rural and urban China. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/06/world/asia/06china.html?_r=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&oref=slogin

1 Comments:

At May 10, 2008 at 9:01 AM , Blogger norman-p said...

Amy,
Along with the phenomenal economic growth of China, the rural population is indeed getting the short end of the stick. They are not sharing in the incoming wealth, they are loosing some of the land, and they may end up getting more of the increasing pollution.

One factor that we didn’t address is that China has just too many people for the land area that it occupies along with insufficient incoming wealth to adequately take care of the 1.3 bn population. The population of China has doubled since the CCP won out in 1949.


For so long as the wealth producing portion of the Chinese population demands more-and-more to go along with its new found wealth there will be more stress placed upon the poorer rural areas in respect to encroachment, pollution, etc.


The Chinese situation is an indication of what is happening world-wide as the pace of globalization increases. The population of the world has approximately doubled during the same period that China’s population doubled. I so believe that some of the things that are occurring in China are also taking place in the rest of the world.


Unfortunately the human population and its leaders have not learned how to balance population and growth so as to make the world self-sustainable. Unfortunately this sets the stage for terrible things to happen, either by humans or by nature.
Best wishes,
Norman Plaks

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home